About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« IPO Webinar on Significant Patent Cases for 2019 | Main | Solicitor General Files Brief in Berkheimer v. HP »

December 08, 2019

Comments

An important and significant opinion that will be of value in the Athena case.

The brief by the Solicitor General is worth a read, if only as a nice recap of the mess in which Section 101 presently finds itself. (No fault on the part of Section 101 as it's worded, though.)

The true scope of the patent law has been substantially confused by the Supreme Court's decisions to effectively strip from the statute the word "discoveries."

Both 35 U.S.C. 101 and Article I Section 8 Clause 8 of the Constitution permit patenting of discoveries. Thus, there appears to be no textual support for excising that word from the statute and for holding that all "discoveries" are necessarily unpatentable subject matter.

The Vanda court noted that the limitation of a claim based on the patient's condition is well within the ambit of the law. The Solicitor General's comment to retain the brief awaiting a more suitable vehicle, simply "kicks the can."

The comments to this entry are closed.

April 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30