About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Teva v. Amneal -- Amneal's Responsive Brief | Main | USPTO Institutes Additional Fees for Large Information Disclosure Statement Filings »

November 13, 2024

Comments

Of the 4 directors I have served under, she was by far the worst. Among many faults, her incessant focus on DEI nonsense was a giant waste of time and resources. Glad to see her leave, but skeptical the next director will be much better

On her watch, we have been subjected to, inter alia, the absurd "docx filing" program, the destruction of PAIR, EFS and the patent assignment filing software, and their replacement with the lousy "Patent Center" and "Assignment Center", both developed without input (and with deliberate ignoring of) input from actual users. She imposed the "tell us where you sleep at night" rule for TM filers. And as a going-away present, she's raising fees for later-filed continuations (how about punishing intransigent examiners instead?), and destroying the trademark filing software as well. (Last week's notice about that new TM software mentioned that it has been optimized for mobile devices. I know of no attorney or firm who files TM applications or prosecution papers on his phone.)

"And we have been successful because of our commitment to putting employees first...We would not have gotten this far without the strength of our people at the USPTO. We have developed processes, procedures, and policies to improve the employee experience and inclusion." I notice that "employee competence" is missing from that list. She certainly didn't pay attention to the people that the PTO is meant to serve.

"inclusive capitalism" - what on earth is that?

She will not be missed.

"Office of Public Engagement". So that's new. Again, sounds buzzy and positive. What it really means is "more bureaucrats to tell you how great you should feel about us turning management over to the union." Any PR piece that uses "inclusive" or "inclusion" was written to laud DEI in mind. Such places will need a thorough housecleaning. It's been 25 years since I retired from the mess Congress and SCOTUS has made of patent law. Glad to be gone, but I do remember with nostalgic fondness my start right out of college in 1969 at $8,000 per year and a culture of young guys (yes, no women, practically) that resembled Frat 2.0.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

January 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Patent Blogs & Sites