About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« The AI-Assisted Patent Attorney | Main | Webinar on Patent Assignments and Priority »

March 01, 2023

Comments

I jump in early, from Europe, in the hope of prompting useful comments in reply. The "abstract idea" litmus test is problematic but so too are "parameter claims" in general.

Thus here. The skilled person knew the relationship between the recited material properties and drilling performance. Further, the skilled person knew that increasing the sintering pressure would improve these performance-relevant material properties. So, when the contribution to the art is the use of a higher sintering pressure, don't claim simply that. Instead claim the resulting product, defined by its material properties. That's an idea in the mind of the patent attorney. I wouldn't call it "abstract" though.

Pity that, here, there isn't a patent family member at the EPO, for comparison what objections to patentability would have been raised.

Regularly assessing the alloy claims of the competitors of my metal industry client leaves me weary and cynical about such "parameter claims", which are hard for a Patent Office to filter out, ex Parte, with the classic tools of 102, 103 and 112 . They need to be filtered out, but how shall a poor beleagured Patent Office, under the cosh of efficiency-seeking management, do it effectively?

The comments to this entry are closed.

April 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30