About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« University of Massachusetts v. L'Oreal S.A. (Fed. Cir. 2022) | Main | The Supreme Court Sidesteps America's Patent Eligibility Crisis »

June 30, 2022


Although several of the judges responsible for the subject matter eligibility mess are no long on the court, I often wonder if what it will take to get the court to correct itself is a loved one of one of these judges dying of a disease that might have been cured, had SCOTUS' jurisprudence in this area not resulted in no patents and thus no investment.

Or the headline on the business section of the NYT or WSJ to read “Supreme Court Destroys US Industry”

The comments to this entry are closed.

June 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29