About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« Lithuanian Patent Office and EUIPO Join Other Patent Offices in Expressing Support for Ukraine | Main | ACI Paragraph IV Disputes Conference »

March 11, 2022


Thanks for the substantive materials.

As I wondered earlier, do the esteemed authors of this blog have any views of the resolution/order in view of Russia's prior treaty (and the like) commitments?

Would such de facto renunciation of those responsibilities harbor retaliatory actions under participation in WTO or GATT/GATS?

Has anyone identified any Russian patent firms on the SDN List?


Thank you for raising this issue, which we are looking into.


Oh now they've done it....

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31