About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Dire Wolf DNA Shows Distinct New World Lineage | Main | Webinar on Means Plus Function Claim Construction »

January 21, 2021

Comments

Certainly hard to parse (guess at) the goals underlying this request, in view of the disassociation between "sex" (XX, XY, and true variations) in the new administration. It does not appear that a proper analysis can even begin until more detailed information, certainly going beyond salutation notations of Mr and Ms, is obtained. Clearly, presumptions about applicants made based on this forced, outdated, and offensive, binary choice should not proceed. I am waiting for the appropriate questionnaire to be developed.

I am offended that you would impose your views that binary is offensive.

Your activist privilege is showing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

April 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30