About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Molecular Mechanism for (In)Famous Warburg Effect in Cancer Elucidated | Main | Webinars on Second Medical Use Patents »

January 06, 2021

Comments

I'm not usually sympathetic to patentees in general, or dosing claims in particular, but in this one it does seem like the patentee got something of a raw deal.

For indefiniteness, just like for any other basis of invalidity, I thought it should still be the challenger's burden by clear and convincing evidence, but here CAFC seemed like it was going out of its way to be unsympathetic to the patentee. Conversely, it seemingly didn't require much of the challenger to carry it's burden.

Just as a matter of common vernacular, I don't think it's so implausible to say that a drug can "target" a particular physiological profile in the sense of being designed to produce that profile when administered. After all, don't we often say that drugs target a specific pathogen and/or area of the body, without that sounding absurd? If so, I think you can say a drug targets a profile too. Presumably one of skill would view it the same way, but this isn't my particular field.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

January 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31