About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« In re Qapsule Technologies, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019) | Main | USPTO Releases Latest Report on Motions to Amend in AIA Post-Grant Review Proceedings »

March 12, 2019


Thanks for the useful summary.
Why do you say 10,000,772 is limited to bacterial cells? The claim recites that "contacting takes place outside of a bacterial cell and outside of an archaeal cell" and Applicant's comments at page 6 of their 4 November 2016 submission seem to expressly state that this language is intended to encompass both inside eukaryotic cells and in vitro methods.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31