About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs

Disclaimer

Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« USPTO Issues Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Law School Clinic Certification Program | Main | Webinar on Patent Reissue »

December 17, 2015

Comments

Congratulations to the CAFC for abdicating its role and enabling the farce that the US patent process has become: issue a patent, often at great cost to the applicant; then renege on that issuance, at further cost to the now-patentee, in a PTAB proceeding in which the patent is invalidated, even though the claimed invention really is useful, novel and non-obvious; and then have the CAFC rubber-stamps the PTAB decision, at yet greater cost to the patentee.

As she is 99.9% of the time, in this case Judge Newman is right.

Apologies to Judge Pauline Newman for our Emily Latella moment. We of course meant no disrespect.

"She raises questions that only the Supreme Court can properly decide if they deign to do so."

I do not see any disrespect for Judge Newman. The Justices of the Supreme Court, on the other hand...

Hey Kevin,

Once again, Newman correctly holds her colleagues' statutory "feet to the fire." She is one of the few currently on the Federal Circuit bench that I respect.

The comments to this entry are closed.

June 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30