About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Amino Chemicals Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2013) | Main | USPTO Proposes Rules Changes to Implement Patent Law Treaty »

June 04, 2013


The 'good news?'

Let's not allow a NIMBY mentality to succeed in a divide and conquer attack.

The parallels between the anti-software patent rhetoric and the anti-patent rhetoric should be alarming all patent practitioners.

Do you really think the wolf will stop if you feed him one chicken? Me, I remain...


More malarkey, now from the White House, on the so-called "patent abuse" problem. This latest missive has all the large paw prints of the so-called Coalition for Patent Fairness. Once more, money speaks in our Nation's Capital (I know, having grown up there).

As always, the devil is in the details.

I wonder how Universities will be treated - they seem to consistently get special treatment.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31