About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« Court Report | Main | Representatives Send Letter to FDA to Explain Data Exclusivity Provisions of Biosimilars Legislation »

January 09, 2011


The survey, which was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, assessed the views of 400 "elite" voters, which were defined as voters having a college degree, a household income of more than $75,000, and who closely follow current events ... and whom are also employed by a BIO corporation or local law firm.


If they did an actual survey of people with only the qualifications you listed then 95%+ would respond that they are totally ignorant of the whole subject and would have to be led by the hand by the questioner/quenstion sheet. Unfortunately.

In a way this is rather hilarious though. It shows you can barely hand pick a sample of people such that you get a majority in support of gene patents.

The comments to this entry are closed.

February 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29