About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« PhRMA Files Amicus Brief in Therasense Case | Main | Court Report »

August 23, 2010

Comments

"The source of the backlog, according to the author, is the interaction with patent examiners under the current system, calling the exchange "overly iterative, done on paper, gated by arcane time periods for action and delayed by almost endless deadline extensions.""

I would be proud to call this man brother.

Feigenbaum has made an excellent point in that significant, substantive patent reform is direly needed. It's true that Congress appears to be "refusing to legislate at the USPTO." I won't hazard a guess at the reasons, which must certainly be political. Nevertheless, in the face of congressional inaction and apparent inability to pass any kind of patent reform legislation, it seems that the best that we can do is rely on David Kappos and his team at the USPTO to make incremental improvements. The three-tiered system may be inadequate, but at least it's a start.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/25/patent-reform-misses-the-mark/

The comments to this entry are closed.

December 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31