About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristant #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« AUTM Survey Shows Drop in Issued Patents | Main | House Bill Seeks to Codify President's Stem Cell Order »

March 11, 2010

Comments

I commend Senator Landrieu for at least asking the highly relevant "$64k" question that no one pushing for modified S.515 has appropriately answered: how does even modified S.515 benefit American small business, and especially American small business innovation? That question is particularly germane as even modified S.515 will create a significant upheavel in how patentability is determined in the U.S. as many of the provisions, including the "grace period" provision, are written with sloppy and ambiguous wording. Until this "$64k" question is addressed to my satisfaction, there's no way I'll support modified S.515.

I would like to hear the "$64k" question: "how would making business methods and anything remotely considered a software patent unpatentable by decree affect small businesses?" being asked.

I would love to hear it.

Isn't that question continuously asked over at techdirt?

The Great Senator from Lousiana: "[s]mall businesses represent 99.7 percent of all employers, employing 1/2 of the U.S. labor force,"


What percentage of small businesses file patents?

What percentage of small businesses are threatened or sued by larger businesses for patent infringement?

Maybe I'm missing something, but I see the first-to-file as an advantage for small businesses.

During litigation, it is difficult to argue with the file date on two different applications. The date is the date, even when you include priority it is relatively simple. First-to-file seems to benefit whoever has the better lawyers and who has better processes to document reduction to practice. A large company will have more and possibly better lawyers, better documentation processes, etc.

The comments to this entry are closed.

August 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31