About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« USPTO to Hold Public Meeting to Discuss PCT improvements | Main | Like Peas in a Pod »

January 11, 2010


Of course, there may be another scenario. This being the Patent Office, how many petitions, filed within the proper time limits after grant, are languishing in the Office "undecided?" It seems like any of these should remain undecided until the Office decides what it will do.

Maybe not as many as you would think, Kevin. The Patent Office has been deciding Wyeth-based decisions and denying them on the merits (refusing to follow the D.C. D.C. decision). While we asked the PTO to hold decisions in abeyance pending the outcome of the Wyeth appeal, the PTO refused to do so, saying there was no authority that permitted the PTO to hold a petition decision in abeyance. Never mind that there also is no authority requiring the PTO to decide a petition in any set time frame.

The comments to this entry are closed.

June 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29