About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Ariad v. Lilly: Ariad's Reply Brief | Main | China IP Law Conference »

December 10, 2009

Comments

Kevin,

Good luck today and go get 'em!

Kev's gonna be more famoose than even me!

Kevin,
Just listened to the SciFri "Gene Patenting" segment.

a) At the end, you asked if you could add 1 more thing but they were out of time, could you perhaps elaborate on that 1 thing here?

b) On the issue of getting the 2nd opinion near the end of the show, it sounded that the ACLU had more updated info on that issue (obviously they're involved in the case and not an observer), and Myriad had denied the ability for someone to get a second opinion/test. I'm curious if you've found out anything else about this after the show and if its indeed true, and if so, why it would make sense for Myriad to deny a second opinion/test instead of working out a license or other?

Otherwise, I was glad to hear this topic reach NPR and get all of the misinformation clarified to the public!

Dear m:

Thanks for listening today. While I had a great many additional things to say, to be honest I was just trying to mention the blog, which has so much more info on it.

Interestingly (and something that will be part of a future post), Myriad sent me an e-mail after the broadcast saying that the situation isn't exactly as Dan reported it. I have to see the letter before I can comment, but the short answer is that it was sent after the lawsuit was filed (which Dan admitted on the show) and Myriad didn't respond substantively (at least in part because of the lawsuit).

Thanks for the comment.

The comments to this entry are closed.

October 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31