About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristant #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« New Director to Be Sworn in on Thursday | Main | PLI Patent Litigation 2009 »

August 13, 2009

Comments

Kevin,

I have very little to quibble with in the BIO brief except for their reference to Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., an awful opinion written by William O. Douglas, and one i criticized extensively in a law revew article I wrote on the patentability of microorganisms (prior to Chakrabarty). Funk Bros. epouses Douglas' narrow-minded anti-patent bias by holding a mixed innoculant unpatentable as trying to claim "one of the ancient secrets of nature now disclosed." As the concurring opinion by Frankfurter correctly observed, that wasn't true. In fact, Breyer's dissent in the Metabolite case looks like the ghost of Douglas reincarnated.

Dear EG:

I was surprised to see that case cited too, at first, and then I thought, since they are using it for its dicta rather than its holding, you could make the argument that even Justice Douglas didn't take as extreme a position as the CAFC did in Bilski.

Or at least I hope that's how the Supreme Court takes it.

Thanks for the comment.

The comments to this entry are closed.

October 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31