About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« USPTO News: Patent Office Calls Continuing Education Pilot Program a Success | Main | Bill to Prohibit Reverse Payments Introduced in the Senate »

February 04, 2009

Comments

Can this patent pass the In Re Bilski test?

I second Martin's question. How does the assay physically transform the sample - does it result in the nucleotide sequence folding in a particular way?

According to an informed source who peruses the USPTO Gazette every week, there are still many patents being granted with claims that don't pass muster under Bilski. Presumably these had already been allowed or the issue fee paid before Bilski was handed down.

Of course, it for the sake of claims like this one that I'm hoping the decision in Bilski gets deeped-sixed down the road.

Looks like this application was allowed BEFORE Bilski. There is no 101 rejection in the last office action in early 2008.

Dear Martin, Dan and Mike:

For what it's worth (since there is no clear answer), we posted a discussion of this issue today.

Thanks for the comments.

I think Bilski would invalidate this claim now.

The comments to this entry are closed.

October 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31