About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Pfizer Expected to Announce Wyeth Acquisition on Monday | Main | Geron Gets Approval for First Human Clinical Trial Using Embryonic Stem Cells »

January 25, 2009

Comments

Is there any way you could include counsel information for each reported case, to the extent available? Thanks!

Hi Sherry,

In the Azopt case, I noticed another filing at the same court:
Case Number: 4:2009cv00030

Any link ups?

Regards,
SKR

Hi JJR - At the time these cases are reported - i.e. when the complaint has just been filed - the only counsel information that is available is the counsel listed on the original complaint. A link to each complaint (in pdf format) is provided at the end of each reported case, and counsel information may be viewed there. Thanks for the comment, and thanks for reading Court Report.

Sandeep,

The other "filing" you noticed is not actually a filing but rather a court docketing error. Somehow the court assigned two case numbers to the same case; the entry not reported exists in the court's docket but does not actually link to case information. So in reality, there is just the one case (the 00032 case reported above). Thanks for the comment.

Sherri

Sherri,

Sorry for the incorrect name in the first post.

And a thank you for the update on the numbering error.

Regards,
SKR

The comments to this entry are closed.

February 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28