About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« Court Report | Main | Changes to PCT Filing Fees »

June 15, 2008


Let me get this straight, people who are messing with congress's blackberry accounts are asking congress for oversight?

Mhmmmm, that'll happen.

Dear e:

You underestimate the "blood in the water" instincts Congress has for this administration. Not guaranteeing it will happen, but it could (did you ever see the scene in Casablana where the policeman is "shocked" that gambling is going on at Rick's?).

Thanks for the comment.

If USPTO's policy (and the APA!) prohibits ex parte communications on pending matters, why was a whole collection of senior administration officials present? They could have just said "sorry, no comment"

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31