About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.
Subscribe to this blog's feed

Contact the Docs

Recent Posts

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Amgen Granted Leave to Introduce New Claims of Inequitable Conduct Against ARIAD | Main | Millennium Pharmaceuticals Spent $1.28 Million on Lobbying in 2007 »

February 08, 2008

Judge Cacheris Takes GSK Case under Advisement

    By Donald Zuhn --

Glaxosmithkline_gsk If you have been reading the reports placed by John White and Bob Spar over at the PLI Patent Blog, then you are probably already aware that Judge James C. Cacheris of the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia did not issue a decision today after hearing the parties’ summary judgment arguments.  As John White reported earlier today, Judge Cacheris announced that due to the mountain of papers filed in the case (the parties’ summary judgment, opposition, and reply briefs alone -- excluding exhibits -- number more than 600 pages, and numerous amici have filed briefs in the case), he was taking the case under advisement and would issue his decision as soon as possible.  Patent Docs will provide additional commentary as soon as the Court has issued a decision.

For additional information regarding today's hearing, please see:

  • Jill Browning's report at Patently-O.

Posted at 11:35 PM in District Court, Patent Office Rules & Procedures |

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

March 2025

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Categories

Archives

More...