About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Insmed Announces National Awareness Campaign Regarding Follow-on Biologics | Main | BIO CEO Provides Update on Patent Reform and Follow-on Biologics Legislation - Part I »

February 13, 2008

Comments

Great analysis, Kevin.

In my comments to my two Senators urging them to vote against S. 1145, I specifically referred to this BIO Report to show how those supporting the so-called Patent Law Reform have no factual case to support any alleged "rampant abuse" of the patent system that would require such so-called "reform". I urge others who realize S. 1145 and it's "evil twin" H.R. 1098 are "shams" to do likewise.

The comments to this entry are closed.

August 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31