About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« Monsanto Co. v. Bayer Bioscience N.V. (Fed. Cir. 2008) | Main | USPTO News: Patent Prosecution Highway Network Expands to Canada & Korea »

January 28, 2008


Thanks for a good review of damages in the upcoming bill.

In the prior user rights section you reference a change that was made to
§ 273(b)(6).

I looked through the bills found at the following link

And, I couldn't find the changes to 273(b)(6) that you referenced.

Please help me understand where these changes are shown. Thanks.

hack_188: While that change was set forth and discussed in the Senate Judiciary Committee's draft report on S. 1145, it does not look like it made it to the reported bill. The Committee may comment on the removal of this provision in the final report on S. 1145, which we have not yet seen.

The comments to this entry are closed.

April 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30