About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« USPTO Proposes Harmonizing Claim Construction Standard In PTAB Proceedings | Main | Webinar on Divided Infringement »

May 10, 2018

Comments

I have been *very* impressed by Mr. Iancu so far, and absolutely *every* one of his specific and tangible suggestions so far has struck me as a good idea. That said, I have to question the wisdom of "a two-point plan to reverse the U.S.'s downward trend..."

I take no issue with the two points, which are both sound and sensible. Rather, I am concerned to think that the PTO director might actually care about the USCOC rankings. Cooley Law School runs its own ranking system in which (to no one's great surprise), Cooley Law School does very well. I am unaware of any other law school that cares much at all about how it places in the Cooley rankings, and that is because the Cooley rankings are a joke. In a similar manner, the USCOC rankings are largely meaningless.

The point of the patent system is to incentivize innovation. To do that, we need orderly and predictable application of well settled, intuitively fair rules. The PTO should concern itself first with achieving predictable application of fair rule, and secondly with the (harder to assess, but ultimately more important) question of whether innovation is proceeding at the best achievable pace. If it can be satisfied with the answer to those two questions, then the USCOC rankings be hanged.

The comments to this entry are closed.

October 2018

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31