E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter

About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.


Become a Fan

« PTAB Chief Judge Discusses Post-grant Review Statistics at IPO Meeting | Main | Webcast on Patent Eligibility »

September 21, 2017


Under agency theory, this point is rather puzzling:

The capacity for Cray's sales representative to move his residence out of the district at any time without Cray's approval vitiates for the Federal Circuit the permanence required by the venue statute.

That's pointing to a meaningless fact. The important fact is that the agent of Cray DID HAVE an established business presence.

Cray's direct "ownership" is a red herring.

Additionally, the “$350 million in sales over the past 7 years” allegedly developed by 2 Cray sales executives allowed to work from home in E.D. TX [instead of at their office outside E.D.TX] is not even asserted to be any sales of any Cray products to anyone in E.D. TX, and the recited facts suggest otherwise.

What does "any sales of any Cray products to anyone in E.D. TX" have to do with anything?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

October 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31