E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

Become a Fan

« Conference & CLE Calendar | Main | Guest Post -- The Emergent Microbiome: A Revolution for the Life Sciences -- Part VIII, The Microbiome and Immunotherapy I »

October 30, 2016

Comments

"there is a difference between merely automating a known manual process and automating a process that is not known to have been previously performed manually."

Of course there's a difference: the former is obvious and the latter might be obvious.

But that "analysis" avoids he issue which is what to do with "automating" information processing steps that are ineligible on their own terms. A new "process" of calculating some number is ineligible whether you do it in your head, or whether you do it on a pencil and paper, or whether you do it with a calculator.

Does the CAFC wish for us to believe that everything changes if you do it "automatically" on a programmable computer? That's absurd. And that's why McRo is a dead letter.

What does "ineligible on their own terms" mean?

Are you taking a parsing to the claims, and attempting to apply eligibility on a claim element by claim element basis?

"What does "ineligible on their own terms" mean?"

Exactly what it says. But pretend that it's weally weally compwicated!

"Are you ...attempting to apply eligibility on a claim element by claim element basis?"

As if there's any other way to determine whether a claim element is ineligible on its own terms.

Your reply is not an answer, Malcolm-by-another-name.

On what words of Congress are you attempting to apply eligibility on a claim element basis?

The comments to this entry are closed.

December 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31