E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

  • Law Blogs

Become a Fan

« News from Abroad: Is an Emergency Marketing Authorisation Valid Basis for an SPC Application for a Plant Protection Product? | Main | When NPR Podcasters Hit the Patent System – An Update »

November 11, 2013

Comments

Jefferson was right:"That government is best which governs least."

Let us hope good sense continues to prevail at the NIH.

Kevin,

Nice write up on this misguided effort to (once again) have NIH assert "march-in-rights" under Bayh-Dole for Norvir. More of the same attitude that R&D, like money, "grows on trees."

Kevin,
Thanks for transmitting this interesting report. However, your last parenthetical gave me pause: Replace "relatively rare genetic mutation" with "a life-threatening and incurable cancer."

Dear Kelly:

Understood, but my point is that 9% of women get breast cancer, but only a small percentage of them carry a BRCA gene mutation. While for those women there is a risk of "life-threatening and incurable" cancer, all of the people taking ritonavir are not at risk for AIDS, they have AIDS. A significant difference, I think.

Thanks for the comment.

"Understood, but my point is that 9% of women get breast cancer,"

O M G. I didn't realize it was that high. I figured more like 3% or lower.

The comments to this entry are closed.

December 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31