E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

  • Law Blogs

Become a Fan

« Sciele Pharma Inc. v. Lupin Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2012) | Main | USPTO Issues Interim Guidance Regarding Mayo v. Prometheus »

July 04, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451ca1469e20167682cd222970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Study Finds That Foreign-Born Inventors Play Prominent Role at Top U.S. Patent-Producing Universities:

Comments

This is a classic lack of control problem. The unreported figure is what percentage of patents have at least one native inventor?

The answer is probably something like 95%. Publishing the control would show how meaningless this "study" is.

In this thread a study finds something that surprises nobody.

Following up on Mr. Slade's point:

http://blogs.sciencemag.org/sciencecareers/2012/06/a-study-by-the.html

In general, beware the indictment this quietly makes about the US and its citizens.

Given that educational and skills-based immigration tends to weed out at least the bottom 30% or so there's already some improved likelihood that a typical cross section of immigrants would have over a typical cross section of native-born citizens in most any comparison. Second, consider how actively universities recruit outside the nation. Third, consider the opportunities. Research is largely done by post-grads who are paid minimally compared to "real-world" jobs. This predisposes domestic students to leave further years of incurring further debt while foreign students conversely stay on campus to extend visas and improve chances of landing work visas.

At the end of the day, 5% of the world cannot provide 95% of the innovation, but there are some mechanisms actually disadvantaging the 5% in question in their own nation. Cleverly cherry-picked statistics are doing little to reverse that trend.

These studies are now becoming transparent, they violate the first rule of algebra -- you can't divide patents by immigrants they are not like terms.

When you actually do track down the numbers that these "studies" will not include(i.e. total inventors in this case), you'll find that that immigrant participation is the same as the immigrant population.

Almost all U.S. citizens' ancestors were immigrants. Immigrants have, historically, always been a boon to the U.S. economy, culture, and sciences. I don't see why the world of patents would be any different.
http://www.generalpatent.com/blog

The comments to this entry are closed.

July 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31