E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

  • Law Blogs

Become a Fan

« Prometheus Labs. v. Mayo Collaborative Services -- Briefing Schedule | Main | USPTO Implements Patent Examiner Technical Training Program »

September 15, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451ca1469e2013487662150970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Senators Seek Vote on Patent Reform Bill:

Comments

Even if the Senate version comes to a vote and passes, didn't the House subtlely, but no less bluntly, state that the Senate version will not become law?

Skeptical:

That is correct. Back in March, a bipartisan group of Representatives, including House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr., released a statement noting that Chairman Leahy's efforts to get the Senate bill passed had proceeded "without adequate input from House members" (see http://www.patentdocs.org/2010/03/house-lacked-adequate-input-on-leahy-patent-reform-bill.html).

Don

It's wonderful to know that the issue of patent reform is not dead, and that members of Congress value IP and are taking steps to improve the lot of the USPTO and patent law. However, we need substantial, substantive reform, which our esteemed senators do not appear to offer in S. 515.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/25/patent-reform-misses-the-mark/

The comments to this entry are closed.

October 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31