E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter

About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

Become a Fan

« Amicus Briefs in Ariad v. Lilly: Regents of University of California et al. | Main | Court Report »

December 07, 2009


Which way to the cliff?

It's encouraging that Kappos and the USPTO are actively taking steps to address efficiency and quality issues currently plaguing patent law. Also a good sign is that Kappos et al. appear to be seriously taking into consideration the interests of entities other than multi-national corporations. Of course, the devil is always in the details, and the ultimate utility and effectiveness of these measures will only become clear with time.

The comments to this entry are closed.

October 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31