E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

Become a Fan

« Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2009) | Main | Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Services (Fed. Cir. 2009) »

September 16, 2009

Comments

Thank you for this item. I'm wondering about your take on the consequences of recent changes in the patent system. In his forthcoming book, Dale Halling suggests that new patent law regulations are the main cause of a current dearth of technological innovation. I wonder whether you would agree.
http://www.GeneralPatent.com

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2016

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31